The only concern I have is ensuring the posted content is ultimately based upon reliable (neutral) sources. MAC CLEANER VS MACKEEPER SOFTWARE119.224.17.35 ( talk) 08:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Indeed lots of controversy regarding the software itself. MAC CLEANER VS MACKEEPER FULLPerhaps the statement "It is known for its aggressive and pervasive advertising, and has been the subject of a class-action lawsuit for the trial version not being fully functional as advertised." or the allegation from the lawsuit that "neither the free trial nor the full registered versions of MacKeeper performed any credible diagnostic testing" (both well referenced in the article) could be promoted to the lead of this article? It seems that this is some controversy here so I'd like to seek a consensus first. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE) 17:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC) It certainly seems to have some controversy around it. I think it's quite unusual and significant that there is this misunderstanding about the nature of the software, do my fellow editors think we should state this in the lead? 119.224.17.35 ( talk) 11:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC) MacKeeper is arguably malware, despite what a page on their own website claims. I added a line to the lead to say A number of anti-malware vendors incorrectly identify MacKeeper as a virus, adware or a potentially unwanted program. MacKeeper incorrectly identified as a virus, adware or a potentially unwanted program
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |